Digression — the Forbidden Stitch
(This started as a reply to CJ’s comment to the previous post…then took on a life of its own)
There are two stories about how the “Forbidden Stitch” (or Forbidden Stitches…there are several that claim the title) got the name.
First off (and not one of the stories) — The “Forbidden Stitch” is not a translation from Chinese. I don’t know what the terms are in Mandarin, but they don’t translate to “Forbidden Stitch.”
The two possibilities are:
1. It’s a fine, tedious stitch done as a filling stitch (meaning the embroiderer gets to do…oh, say a couple hundred to completely cover a square inch of ground fabric) so, when European embroidery teachers first recognized and dissected its construction, they labeled it “Forbidden” ’cause no one wanted the good women of Europe going blind because they were trying to imitate those inscrutable Chinese.
And while I don’t doubt that one could find pretty much that exact sentiment in any number of books, I don’t really think that that’s how the stitch(es) got their name….though, it *is* true that properly done, the Forbidden Stitches are tiny stitches and that in the absence of good lighting and/or magnification (a virtual given prior to the twentieth century) only young embroiderers could do them perfectly. Embroidery isn’t going to blind anyone (not unless you get real careless with the needle) but between chronic eyestrain and ordinary presbyopia, there can come a point where it’s not just that you can’t see the needle’s eye…you can’t see the thread or the stitch you just made.
Option 2: What we tend to think of as “traditonal” Chinese embroidery — the dragons and “rank badges” of both antique and tourist trade provenance, is the Imperial embroidery of the Ming and (especially) the Manchu dynasties (in part, because there’s not a whole lot of pre-17th century silk left to admire or study). As I understand it, the Manchus took Ming motifs and structures and created a strict hierarchic structure, both social and embroidered — sort of like European sumptuary laws
Certain motifs can be worn only by persons of certain status (five-toed dragons, for example, could only be worn by the Emperor. Members of his family were only entitled to lesser-toed dragon. Those not of the Imperial family couldn’t wear dragons at all but were entitled to other animals — hence the “rank badges” that dominate the antique and reproduction market.
Anyway, it won’t come as a great surprise to read that the Imperial Palace (aka the Forbidden City) contained workrooms where garments for the Imperial court were made or that Imperial workrooms had access to the best raw materials, the best artisans, and turned out garments of spectacular quality…or that what was done in the Forbidden City was supposed to stay in the Forbidden City.
So, the Forbidden Stitch describes the particular stitches that distinguish Imperial Palace (Forbidden City) garments from lesser clothing and possibly (though not certainly) that some of the embroidery techniques employed in the emperor’s workroom were considered “state secrets” and it was illegal to teach them (or use them) elsewhere.
My guess is that Option 2 is an original and somewhat scholarly source and Option 1 became a popular (though erroneous) explanation.
Elsewhere on the web, there are some good pictures and stitch diagrams at http://www.marlamallett.com/forbidden_stitch.htm
For more about “dragon robes,” I recommend “The Art of Oriental Embroidery” by Young Y Chung which devotes a whole chapter to them and has some good photographs.
For Chinese clothing in general I reccomend “5000 Years of Chinese Costumes” by Zhou Xun — if you can find it (I certainly wouldn’t recommend *buying* it at Amazon. On the other hand, there’s nothing else quite like it…
(Ah, the joys (and dangers) of browsing the bookshop at EGA seminars…)
In April, after some shuffling of schedules, Diane and I and one of Diane’s longtime friends who’d come to Florida to escape Indian Winter up north, headed up to Gainesville to view a pair of art exhibits, both hung around a “Kimono” theme.
From the beadwork (still headed for the kimono) we went through their Chinese costume gallery (I can’t think of another art museum of comparable size that has a Chinese costume gallery — must have something to do with University of Florida donor characteristics). Non-flash photography was allowed in the gallery and, since I’m easily seduced by silk thread I took a few pictures. Most of the garments were summer robes from the late Manchu period. (That’s early 20th century…before my time and less unsettling in a museum context.) Although I’ve read about horse-hoof robes before (the one on the left) I haven’t seen many “in the flesh” and these were displayed in a way that made it easy to study the embroidery, which was impressive…but not singular. It’s easy to imagine crowded workrooms where hordes of under-paid embroiderers stitched their lives away. No surprise that one of the primary stitches was known as the “Forbidden Stitch” or that the Imperial embroiderers were said to go blind from their work
ar that the summer robes were embroiderered after they were sewn together (the motifs cover the seams) unlike the horse-hoof robes where the fabric was embroidered before construction.